Map
Naples City Dock
880 12th Avenue South, Naples
NAPLES — Naples officials don’t want to toss the Naples City Dock another lifesaver.
But the question of how to keep the Naples landmark out of the red has some city officials wondering whether they should drift away from the dock business.
Naples City Council members in recent weeks have raised the question of whether the city plans to look into privatizing the dock. The questions come as council members were asked to transfer money to keep the dock afloat.
The council voted 5-2 in June to transfer $185,176 from the city’s general fund to the dock fund to help balance the budget. They also gave City Manager Bill Moss the ability to make $229,140 worth of reductions to the budget.
Councilwoman Teresa Heitmann and Councilman Gary Price cast the dissenting votes. Price said these transfers weren’t the best way to solve the dock’s ongoing financial problems.
“Shut it down and lease the dock for 100 years at $1 a year,” Price said during the June 3 council meeting. “I’ll tell you if we lease it for a $1 a year, we’d be $400,001 a year ahead.”
While Price later said his suggestion during the June 3 meeting was an extreme example, he said he would be interested in looking into whether the city would benefit from privatization.
“I’m hoping the business plan would give us an alternative to run the dock and be profitable,” Price said. “But if part of the business plan is hope that the economy turns ... hope for a better day is not a good business model.”
The dock has been losing money for about three years, and Moss said the slumping marine industry has contributed to the declining revenue. The business plan, Moss said, should alleviate the budgetary problems.
That’s something Councilman Bill Willkomm said he’s heard before.
Willkomm said he was told in 2006 that there was a problem at the dock, and that the staff was developing a plan to solve the budgetary woes. Three years later and Willkomm said the problem has just become worse.
“There’s got to be some sort of accountability of running (the dock) into the ground,” Willkomm said. “What they’ve done so far is not working. These people have to be held accountable.”
Accountability is Willkomm’s reason for asking the city to look into privatization. It’s not that he wants to give up control of the dock; Willkomm said the issue is more about responsibly running the dock.
“I don’t know what the problem is,” he said. “I see no reason why it can’t be run properly.”
Dock operations have been an issue, and those concerns have led city officials to look into privatization in the past. Naples City Council last looked into privatization in 2003, when then-City Manager Kevin Rambosk recommended the city study the issue.
Privatizing the dock meant that city staff would have extra time to devote to other issues, according to a March 2003 article in the Naples Daily News. Community Services Director Dave Lykins said at the time he spent about 40 percent of his work day focusing on the dock, the report went on to say.
The city asked for proposals from companies in spring 2003, and while 17 marine management firms expressed interest in taking over control of the dock, the city received only three proposals.
Naples Mayor Bill Barnett said privatizing the dock has never really been off the table. The city just hasn’t been actively looking for management companies.
“Anybody who is interested, they can always submit an offer,” Barnett said. “(But) it’s got to be something that’s going to work for the city, and one thing is for sure, we’re not going to sell that dock.”
At the time, International Marinas, L.C. of Fort Lauderdale, said it would pay the city $100,000 a year to lease the dock, or 15 percent of the gross operating revenue. At the same time, WESTREC Marina Management Inc. of Dania Beach said it would pay the city $375,000 a year to lease the dock, or 75 percent of the total gross revenue.
The third proposal was disqualified, Lykins said.
Naples City Council has asked to obtain copies of those proposals, and Moss said he planned to have the proposals ready for council before their next meeting.
And while privatizing the dock could mean just franchising the dock, like the operation at Lowdermilk Beach, it could also mean turning over all operations to a private management company.
Moss said he isn’t ruling out looking into privatization, but did say he understood the emotions surrounding the dock.
There has been interest in taking over control of the dock recently, Barnett said. He would not comment on who has expressed interest.
The council will discuss the business plan for the city dock in August.
Harley-Davidson Naples Freedom Ride 2012
Punta Gorda Prostitution Arrests…
Collier County arrests 05-22-2012














Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 9
nanbann writes:
Get rid of Lykins and hire a professionally trained dock manager and the problems go away. Lykins has no clue what to do and delegates authority to staff that is in beyond their training.
Run the dock like a business and not a political football and things will get resolved.
The dock got in trouble when Lykins got in charge.
theabyss writes:
Privatize then pay.. that's what capitalism is all about. Then when it goes out of business the gov't can get it back at pennies on the dollar. Sounds good to me... Bidders step up to the podium!!!
Trojanz33 writes:
Naples, to hell in a handbag.
unygfw writes:
The City has for years been shifting the ad valorem tax burden to cash cows like the dock through administrative fees and other tax-related payments without the kind of oversight a reasonable person would expect from his or her elected representatives. The truth is finally coming to light. Prior city councils would have realized that an investment in facilities like the dock is for the public's recreation. If that's not something the city wants to continue doing, then the best thing would be to get rid of it. Most of the people in the city have their own private docks anyway and the common folk can get a glimpse of Naples Bay when crossing the Gordon River bridges which have been so beautifully decorated with stupid-looking light fixtures. Let's come to our senses and get our priorities right, people. The city dock is not a business any more than any other recreational facility because on the one hand it's reluctant to compete in the local marketplace and on the other hand, if these operations were run as a true business, there would be real accountability which is not there with our confused political leaders.
CaptSam (Inactive) writes:
The Dock was making money for years, it's not the current staff or Mike Klein, they're the best team I've seen in place since the 60's. The DEP closed down the live in's and the rentals are not paying enough to cover their expenses. The Dock's fuel costs aren't any worse than anyone elses, it's a bad economy and yes you can base a business plan on it because it will eventually come back. Keep it afloat another year and re-evaluate it and no I'm not a dock employee just a lifelong resident.
seventensplit writes:
I say privatize it and call it the Allen Walburn dock. That will fix them.
HARTLAND writes:
How come private can manage something better than public, and even make a profit? Just doesn't make sense. Oh yeah, I forgot. Public is government. Now I understand.
Caliban writes:
The City Dock is a Joke. The design is prohibitive to making money. Too many small slips not enough commercial. They need to redesign the dockage while working with their submerged leases. There are a bunch of small slips open and no big ones available, move the dolphin poles and make a couple of big spots. At least they would be rented and there would be no encumbrance on the state lease. The City Dock is run by "NO" People, government employees with no incentive to think outside the box. My kid can come up with better ideas than the present management.
DinNaples writes:
No 100 year leases, that's dumb. Also, since the city can't run it now,how can they write a lease. Put it out for proposal, have those interested in running it tell us how they think it may best be done. Then hopefully a smarter decision can be made. One that may even bring a profit to the city (that they can use to improve it.).
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.