Lee school district leader urges board to tear up budget, start over

Tom Scott; Lee Co. School Board Chair on Newsmakers 6-26-11

Tom Scott; Lee Co. School Board Chair on Newsmakers 6-26-11

"There needs to be a justification for every dime and dollar we spend," Lee County School Board member Tom Scott said.

— Some Lee County School Board members want a budget built from scratch, not a budget based on a three-year average and inflated wants.

Board member Tom Scott is fed up with the Lee School Board's dependence on dwindling reserves to make ends meet. At Tuesday's School Board budget workshop, Scott will push for zero-based budgeting for the 2013-14 school year.

At least one of his fellow board members, Don Armstrong, fully supports him.

"There needs to be a justification for every dime and dollar we spend," Scott said.

Scott hopes holding employees accountable for each item on the budget will save the district at least $15 million — the same amount the district expects to use of its $48 million in reserves this year. The district's total operating budget is around $760 million.

Currently, the district builds the budget based off of a three-year average of all operating expenses and then makes necessary adjustments to it.

Zero-based budgeting, often used by businesses, forces every department to start building their budget from scratch. Each item on the budget would have to be approved by the board, rather than just the changes or additions made to the budget.

It isn't that simple, according to Lee schools Superintendent Joseph Burke, who said public schools have to factor in state requirements like the class-size amendment.

"That means so many teachers, so many dollars," he said. "It's not the kind of pure, zero-based budgeting that would be desired."

 Lee County Schools Superintendent Joseph Burke on NewsMakers 1-15-12.

Lee County Schools Superintendent Joseph Burke on NewsMakers 1-15-12.

"That means so many teachers, so many dollars," Lee schools Superintendent Joseph Burke said. "It's not the kind of pure, zero-based budgeting that would be desired."

Burke said other challenges, such as collective bargaining agreements and training, make this budgeting concept difficult for school districts to fully implement.

But he's not completely opposed to the idea. He suggested applying a variation of zero-based budgeting that first lays out state requirements and mandates to determine "how much of the budget that chews up." He said the remaining money could be allocated using zero-based budgeting.

Burke projected this could save the district around $10 million for the 2013-14 budget.

Still, he said, the district doesn't have too much loose change.

Armstrong sees plenty of it.

The board member said there's too much "want" in the district that translates into too many employees spending money they don't need to spend — like the $5 million in overtime in the district last year.

"This is not my money. This is the taxpayers' money," Armstrong said. "The constituents are done watching government spend money foolishly."

Although it's too late to do the budgeting exercise for this year's entire budget — the school district's fiscal year begins July 1 — Armstrong wants to try it in one department before the School Board approves the 2012-13 budget in September.

He suggested using the transportation department.

"Tear it down to nothing and build it back up," he said, "I'll show you where we can save money."

Brad Hobbs, a Florida Gulf Coast University economics professor, said zero-based budgeting could be a cost-saving exercise for a public institution like Lee schools.

"At some point you have to realize you're spending more than you're bringing in," he said.

Trying to restructure the system using zero-based budgeting could eliminate long-standing positions within the district and stir up controversy, Hobbs said.

"There are some oxen that are going to be gored," he said.

The School Board and Burke are scheduled to discuss the 2012-13 budget during a board workshop that begins at 2:30 p.m. Tuesday at the district's administrative offices on Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers.

The superintendent also will present to the board a few million dollars in proposed cuts, including support staff and administrative personnel layoffs, to help balance this year's budget. He said teachers won't be affected by the cuts.

Even with those changes, Burke anticipates the district will have to dip into reserves to make ends meet for the 2012-13 school year.

That's exactly why Scott said he won't back down until the district agrees to zero-based budgeting for the following year.

"Because at some point," Scott said, "You run out."

© 2012 Naples Daily News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Related Links

Comments » 4

Beachglow writes:

Finally, somebody with some sense. These school boards are out of control and usually have no training whatsoever in finance. Collier County school system might try the same approach. They throw money away or spend it needlessly like it's grown on Banyan trees.

It's time to reel it all in given the lack of good performance by the school system for years and years and years. Too much fluff that is really not needed and never has been with administrative salaries, pensions and perks totally out of control thanks to these foolish unions.

volochine writes:

When old white men debate the educational futures of the few kids in SWFL, I realize that we should have old women of all races in charge of education. If school boards had been made up of women in the past 30 years, we would not see these problems.

nnsejs writes:

And....once, again, teachers will ultimately pay the price...with their own salaries. So glad I am out of the door at the end of the year!

wonderful (Inactive) writes:

in response to Beachglow:

Finally, somebody with some sense. These school boards are out of control and usually have no training whatsoever in finance. Collier County school system might try the same approach. They throw money away or spend it needlessly like it's grown on Banyan trees.

It's time to reel it all in given the lack of good performance by the school system for years and years and years. Too much fluff that is really not needed and never has been with administrative salaries, pensions and perks totally out of control thanks to these foolish unions.

How 'bout the proper approach. Transport, feed, provide a secure environment, and give the educational and support personnel what they need to do their jobs. Then add on the fluff where necessary.

For one CHUB you can hire three teachers or give 5 teachers a more appropriate salary. If you hire professionals then they should be professionals, eh?

Or you could start having bake sales to pay for the classroom activitiies, but under the current system you will need an assistant superintendent of bake sales, secretaries, office space, letter heads, and committee meetings to make it work.

Outta control!

Cut the CHUB! Let the teachers teach!

Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.

Features